Corporate America, the good news is that people trust you more than they trust the government

4259281193_859f22ba22The bad news is that being more trustworthy than the government isn’t much of an achievement.

The Edelman Trust Barometer, that annual worldwide survey of the trustworthiness of government, business, NGOs, and media, was released earlier this year. The key takeaway for business is that while the corporate world is more trusted than our elected officials, people don’t trust it very much, and they trust people in their social media networks a whole lot more.

For example, in the U.S., 38 percent of survey respondents don’t trust business leaders to tell them the truth. Think about that—when the CEO of one of America’s most venerable brands speaks, more than one out of every three people who hear the message thinks he or she is lying.

That’s bad.

When asked which industries they trust the most to do “what’s right,” banks and financial service companies scored the worst: just 47 and 45 percent, respectively, trusted these types of companies to do the right thing. When you boil it down, it means that more than half of all people ages 25-64 in 20 countries around the world think banks and financial service companies are probably up to no good.

Furthermore, companies are performing the worst in some of the areas that people consider the most important, including attributes such as “listens to customers,” “transparent practices,” and “communicates frequently and honestly.”

Wow. Corporate America, you’ve got a problem or as we say in the marketing biz… an opportunity to make some changes. Fortunately, there are some institutions that people still trust, and that includes traditional media (which saw a 10 percent increase in the number of people who trust them), but more importantly, social media. The rising star in this year’s Edelman report was social media sites, which saw a 75 percent increase in the number of people who trust them.

Edelman recommends using social media and engaging company employees to tell the company’s story. (We’d recommend doing the right thing, being honest, and so on, as well.) About 6 out of 10 consumers say they need to hear something about a company 3-5 times before they’ll believe it. Social media is the perfect way to accomplish that—one positive post that spreads to just a few people, and your company may have new converts.

Although it’s discouraging that so few people trust corporations, you can’t blame them. Acting responsibly and honestly is up to business leaders. That kind of role modeling may require massive restructuring, rebuilding corporate cultures, and rethinking what a company’s real mission is. Then it’s a matter of how to walk-the-talk. Once that’s done, communicating becomes more believable and effective, especially when companies take advantage of the channels that consumers still trust.

Share

Barnes and Noble recently announced it will open up its struggling Nook platform to Google’s offerings, including Chrome, Gmail, Google Maps and Google Play, an online digital content store that will compete directly with Barnes and Nobles’ own store that is built into the Nook. However, Barnes and Noble won’t get any money from Google Play sales made via the Nook. And since Barnes and Noble sells the Nook at a razor thin margin, it has to be banking that a) it will now sell a lot more Nooks since people can access all things Google and b) people will choose to buy their content from the Nook’s built-in (and easy-to-access) store rather than using Chrome to browse Google Play. All of this makes me wonder if Barnes and Noble is long for this Earth.

3581044836_ddf3da4f5a_oAnd if Barnes and Noble were to go away, what would become of local bookstores? True, many, if not most, suburbs across America still have a local bookstore. But for many others, the local Barnes and Noble, which is a ubiquitous presence at upscale shopping centers, is the only game in town. And if it goes away, that would be a shame.

In a somewhat-dated article from 2011, Slate writer Farhad Manjoo argues that supporting one’s local bookstore is the wrong thing to do. He argues that while local bookstores may promote local authors, they mostly sell the same books as Amazon does for about twice the price. And he’s correct that Amazon offers a much better model for buying a book—one gets readers’ reviews, excerpts and a good price, and with the advent of e-readers and tablets over the last couple of years, you can download the book in far less time than it takes to drive to the mall, buy an overpriced coffee and browse the shelves.

Sadly for bookstore lovers, he’s right. If brick-and-mortar music stores succumbed to online stores (which are now succumbing to streaming services like Spotify and Pandora), why should bookstores (which often carry music) be any different?

I offer up a ray of hope to local bookstores and the people who love the tactile and sensory adventures that they are: go local. Big, online companies stink at going local. Just as newspapers have found success in being hyper-local, so can bookstores. And this doesn’t mean a “local authors” section in the back. This means only local authors. Only local music. If it wasn’t written within 100 miles, you won’t find it here. Think of your local farmer’s market, but for books.

While social media has made us strangers to our next-door neighbors, it has helped make us more aware of what’s happening in our broader community, if not down the street. If a cool band is playing at a local venue or a new play is opening in the community theater, social media is by far the best and easiest way to find out about it. We just never knew these things were happening in the past, because the community players can’t afford TV and radio advertising, but social media is free.

We have discovered that our communities possess far more abundant and vibrant cultural offerings than we had ever imagined. So let it be with books.

Share